Government Clears Changes to Proposed Station Names to Reflect Cultural and Regional Significance

Correspondent: Deepak Sagar
New Delhi

In a move aimed at reinforcing regional identity and cultural representation, the Government of Delhi has approved changes to several proposed metro station names across the capital.


Officials stated that metro stations are not merely transit points but symbols of a locality’s history, social fabric, and cultural heritage. After detailed review and consultations, the government examined 21 proposed station names — retaining 12, modifying 7, and completely renaming 2 stations.


Stations Completely Renamed
Haiderpur Village (earlier proposed as North Pitampura)
Madhuban Chowk (earlier proposed as Pitampura)
These changes aim to better align station names with established local identities and geographic references.
Key Modified Station Names
The following stations have been revised to offer clearer geographic context and stronger local association:
Uttari Pitampura–Prashant Vihar
Jagatpur–Wazirabad
Nanak Pyao–Derawal Nagar
Khanpur–Vayusenabad
Nanaksar–Sonia Vihar
Shri Ram Mandir Mayur Vihar
Mangalpur Kalan–West Enclave
Officials noted that these adjustments were made to enhance clarity for commuters while respecting community sentiments.
Stations Retaining Original Names


Several stations will continue with their originally proposed names, including:


Majlis Park
Bhalaswa
Haiderpur Badli Mor
Deepali Chowk
Yamuna Vihar
Bhajanpura
Khajuri Khas
Sauraghat
Jharoda Majra
Burari
Pushpanjali
Maujpur–Babarpur
Objective Behind the Move
The government emphasized that:
Metro stations represent more than mobility hubs — they embody local history and culture.


Public suggestions from residents, elected representatives, and concerned authorities were taken into account.
The renaming exercise will improve geographical clarity and navigation convenience for passengers.


Balancing Development and Heritage


As Delhi’s metro network continues to expand, the renaming initiative is being viewed as an important step toward balancing urban development with preservation of local identity.


By aligning infrastructure with community heritage, authorities aim to strengthen the connection between public spaces and the people they serve — ensuring that growth in the capital remains both modern and rooted in tradition.