New Delhi | Special Correspondent: Arun Sharma

In a significant observation with nationwide implications, the Delhi High Court has ruled that every dowry harassment complaint cannot be presumed to be true and must be subjected to fair, impartial and thorough investigation. The court cautioned against the mechanical use of criminal law in matrimonial disputes, stressing that misuse undermines both justice and social harmony.
A Bench led by Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, while hearing a case related to alleged dowry harassment and family dispute, observed that the in-laws’ side cannot be treated as guilty by default. The court underlined that there are instances where legal provisions meant to protect women are misused to exert pressure or settle personal scores.
The court noted that in the present case, the complainant had left the matrimonial home within a few years of marriage and remained away for a prolonged period. Records and mediation proceedings indicated repeated financial demands, raising serious doubts about the bona fides of the criminal complaint. The Bench remarked that criminal proceedings in such circumstances often become tools of coercion rather than instruments of justice.
Emphasising the original intent of dowry laws, the High Court said these provisions were enacted to shield genuine victims of abuse, not to criminalise routine marital discord or fuel prolonged litigation. The court warned that indiscriminate registration of FIRs in dowry cases leads to harassment of innocent family members and burdens the criminal justice system.
The High Court advised the police and trial courts to exercise caution and apply judicial mind before initiating coercive action, ensuring that allegations are backed by credible material. Concluding the matter, the court granted relief to the husband and his family members, observing that justice must be balanced, evidence-based and free from emotional or mechanical assumptions.
Legal experts view the ruling as a crucial reminder for responsible enforcement of dowry laws, reinforcing the need to protect both genuine victims and innocent individuals alike.
