New Delhi | Special Correspondent: Arun Sharma

In a move that has sparked nationwide debate, medical graduates and young doctors have approached the Supreme Court to challenge the drastic reduction in post-graduate NEET cut-off marks, citing serious implications for the future of India’s healthcare system.


The decision, which lowered minimum qualifying percentages from 50% to 7% for general and EWS candidates, and from 40% to 0% for SC/ST/OBC, while reducing PwBD (persons with benchmark disabilities) requirements from 45% to 5%, has triggered concerns over quality, competency, and patient safety.


The United Doctors Front (UDF), led by Dr. Lakshman Mittal, filed a public interest litigation, arguing that the cut-off reduction undermines merit, fairness, and the preparedness of future medical professionals. “This decision risks compromising the quality of medical education and, ultimately, the safety of patients across the country,” said Dr. Mittal.


Experts warn that such a significant lowering of eligibility standards could lead to a shortage of skilled medical professionals, weakening India’s healthcare delivery in the coming years. They emphasize that competent doctors are essential not only for treatment but also for public health management, patient safety, and nationwide medical development.


The UDF has urged the Health Ministry to reconsider the decision and restore minimum qualifying standards to ensure that only adequately trained doctors advance to post-graduate medical training.


With the Supreme Court set to hear the case, the outcome is expected to have far-reaching consequences for the nation’s medical education system, shaping the future of healthcare accessibility and the quality of patient care in India.


This case has become a national issue, highlighting the delicate balance between expanding opportunities in medical education and maintaining the standards necessary to safeguard public health.